Gaming Ban in NJ Library

The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund has signed a letter from the National Coalition Against Censorship to the Paterson Free Public Library in Paterson, New Jersey.  The letter was sent in response to the library banning the play of first-person shooters on library computers.

The letter takes library officials to task for subscribing to the same unsupported views that led to video game bans in Massachusetts, a presidential recommendation and proposed bill mandating research on video games and violence, and the fallacious claim by one senator that video games are a “bigger problem” than guns. NCAC writes in their letter:

The library has not offered any sound justification for removing access to specific games. Instead, according to published reports, librarians are taking this action to “prevent our kids from learning these behaviors.’’ This assumes that viewers will simply imitate behaviors represented in fictional settings without any independent mental intermediation, a proposition that is palpably false and that the library implicitly rejects by offering access to all sorts of internet sites and maintaining a varied collection of books, magazines, videos and other materials.

The letter further points out that the library is not allowed to selectively ban access to printed materials that are protected by the Constitution, so they cannot do so with video games. Further, library officials are not allowed to remove protected materials simply because they do not like them.

Further, the ban applies to patrons of all ages, including adults, thus violating their First Amendment rights.

Follow the link below to the full article and letter that was sent by the National Coalition Against Censorship:

http://cbldf.org/2013/02/cbldf-signs-letter-protesting-video-game-ban-in-nj-library/

 

CBLDF joins with Others to Defend Neonomicon

The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund has joined the National Coalition Against Censorship  and the American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression in writing a letter to the Greenville County Public Library, in South Carolina, to defend Alan Moore’s Neonomicon.  The following is the letter from http://cbldf.org/homepage/cbldf-teams-with-ncac-and-abffe-in-defense-of-alan-moores-neon.  I thought it was very well written and worth the space to place it within this blog for librarians to read.  I have not altered it and you can connect to the link above to read the same letter on CBLDF’s website.

“Dear Board Members,

“On behalf of the National Coalition Against Censorship, the American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression and the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund we strongly urge you to keep Alan Moore’s Neonomicon in the Greenville Public Library. This book has reportedly been challenged by a member of the community who claims its “sexually graphic” images make it inappropriate for the library.

“Removing this book because of objections to its content is impermissible under the First Amendment. As the Supreme Court said in Board of Education v. Pico, the Constitution does not permit “officially prescribed orthodoxy” which limits what people may read, think, speak, or say. The fact that we are confronted with images and not words does not make a difference—the courts have ruled that images, like words, constitute symbolic expression and are protected by the First Amendment.

“Neonomicon is a horror graphic novel which explores themes present in the works of fantasy writer H.P. Lovecraft, delving into complex issues of race, crime and sexuality. Moore and artist Jacen Burrows use the visual nature of the graphic novel medium to more fully examine the subject matter found in Lovecraft’s original work, achieving a commentary both on Lovecraft and on the horror genre itself. The authors deliberately disturbing depictions of sexual violence are included as a critical comment on how such subject matter is handled elsewhere within the genre. The book recently won the Bram Stoker award for “Superior Achievement in a Graphic Novel.” Its critical acclaim testifies to its artistic value which is aided, not eclipsed, by its sexual content.

“Alan Moore is one of the most influential and acclaimed authors in both the graphic novel category and the larger literary culture. His body of work includes Watchmen, which Time Magazine named one of the 100 best English-language novels published since 1923. His works also include the graphic novels V For Vendetta, League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, From Hell, and Lost Girls, all of which have enjoyed tremendous critical acclaim. Neonomicon continues Moore’s explorations in appropriating classic literary characters and themes in the service of post-modern storytelling. It is an essential work by an author who is indisputably a master within his field.

“The book was appropriately shelved in the adult section of the library. The fact that it was withdrawn by a minor, whose mother had given written permission for her to borrow materials  from the adult section, is no basis for removing the book—an action that infringes the First Amendment rights of adult library patrons. Indeed, the removal of the book during the review process is itself problematic, since any government suppression of material because of objections to its viewpoint or content transgresses constitutional boundaries. As a legal matter, the harm has  been done, even if it is later rectified.

“The book meets the criteria that form the basis for the library’s collection development policy. Removing it because of sexual content not only fails to consider the indisputable value of the book as a whole, but also ignores the library’s obligation to serve all readers, without regards to individual tastes and sensibilities. If graphic violent and sexual content were excluded from the library because some people object to it, the library would lose ancient and contemporary classics, from Aeschylus’ Oresteia to Toni Morrison’s Beloved.

“We strongly urge you to respect the rights of all readers to read and think freely, and to reject the notion that the views of some readers about the value of literature, or its “appropriateness”, maybe imposed on all. By keeping the books on the library shelves you will demonstrate respect for your readers and their choices, for the professionalism of the librarians who serve the reading public, and for the First Amendment and its importance to a pluralistic democratic society.

“Please consult NCAC’s resource “Graphic Novels: Suggestions for Librarians” (http://ncac.org/graphicnovels.cfm) or contact us if there is anything we can do to help.

“Sincerely,

Joan Bertin Executive Director National Coalition Against Censorship

Chris Finan President American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression

Charles Brownstein Executive Director Comic Book Legal Defense Fund”

omicon/

 

Liberty Cards Available

Here is a way that your patrons, that enjoy comic books and manga, can support the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund (CBLDF).  Cryptozoic Entertainment is releasing the CBLDF Liberty Trading Cards this week.  This Fund helps store owners and individuals that have been arrested for selling or owning comic books or manga that some find objectionable.  While some of the titles you yourself might not like the Funds mission is one that library’s should support.  The Fund helps defend challenges to the United States First Amendment.  The packs have five cards per pack with a suggested price of $3.50 per pack.  Inserts within the packs are randomly packed autograph and sketch cards.  This could be a program where libraries could purchase some packages for giveaways at their library or purchase a box and sell the packs for $1.00 and then forward that money on to the CBLDF as an additional donation to the Fund.  This is a way to show your patrons that not just novels are challenged, but also something they enjoy.

http://cbldf.org/homepage/cbldf-liberty-trading-cards-in-stores-this-week/

Supreme Hands Down Decision on Brown v. EMA

The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund has announced on their sight that the Supreme Court has handed down a decision in the Brown v. EMA case.  The court struck “down the California law that attempted to ban the sale and display of violent video games to minors in a 7-2 decision”.  Justice Scalia wrote the majorities decision for the court.  To view the full article and excepts from the decision follow the link below.

http://cbldf.org/homepage/breaking-cbldf-cheers-free-speech-victory-in-brown-v-ema/

CBLDF at ALA

The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund (CBLDF) will be attending the American Library Association’s Conference this week.  If you are their and reading this or a getting ready to go stop by their booth #1749.  Friday night CBLDF is co-sponsoring with First Second Books a Live Art Event from 5:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.  Some of the artist present will be: Dave Roman – Astronaut Elementary; Raina Telgemeier – Babysitters Club; Jim Ottaviani – Feynman; Ben Hatke – Zita the Spacegirl; and Eric Wight – Frankie Pickle.  Then on Saturday starting at 1:00 p.m., Jennifer L. Holm will be signing one-of-a-kind Babymouse prints for a $25.00 membership.  There will also be other signed incentives when you make donations at CBDLF’s booth.  Stop by and visit and thank them for being a watchdog for First Amendment rights.

http://cbldf.org/homepage/cbldf-heads-to-the-ala-annual-conference-with-exclusive-babymouse-print/

Playing Video Games at the Supreme Court

The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund’s site has posted a short article over Video Games.  The Supreme Court is currently looking at a case Brown v. EMA.  In this case California is seeking an appeal on a law the state passed, that minors can not purchase video games that have violent content because it is harmful to minors.  Within their own state the law was struck down as a violation of the 1st Amendment, hence the appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.  What is worry some to the CBLDF and others is that this law if left to stand could be expanded to include other forms of media to include comic books.  For the full article make the jump below.

http://cbldf.org/homepage/supreme-court-may-soon-make-decision-about-violent-video-games/

Utah and the 1st Amendment

Comic Book Legal Defense Fund’s site has a report of a coalition the organization has joined.  The coalition is working to have one of Utah’s proposed statues defeated.  The statue is on censoring the Internet and was passed in 2005, but has not been enforced.  It is currently in the courts – Florence v. Shurtleff, No. 05-CV-485 in the United States District Court, District of Utah.  The law “seeks to regulate all Internet speech that some might consider ‘harmful to minors’, including works of visual art, photography, graphic novels, and information about sexual health and the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth”.  Jump of to the site for the full article.

http://cbldf.org/homepage/booksellers-artists-aclu-seek-to-bar-utah-law-restricting-speech-on-internet/

Jefferson Muzzels

Each year the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression awards the Jefferson Muzzel Awards.  The awards are to point out, “abridgments of free speech and press and, at the same time, foster an appreciation for those tenets of the First Amendment.”  Linked below is the listing of the eight reciepeants of the Jefferson Muzzel Award and why they recieved them for this year.

http://www.tjcenter.org/muzzles/muzzle-archive-2011/